[Cubicweb] [PATCH RFC] Add a "Contributing" section to README with patch submission guidelines

Sylvain Thénault sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr
Fri Feb 24 08:54:47 CET 2017

Le 23/02/2017 à 15:32, Arthur Lutz a écrit :
> Not too used to reviewing code via email, I'm not sure about this
> change, but I'll vote neutral or abstain.
> One question : this applies to cubicweb's core, what about cubes ? We
> keep the vcreview-based workflow ?

Did you read"Rétrospective 'revue de code'" at the bottom of
https://intranet.logilab.fr/intra/blogentry/465052 (internal link) ?

Regarding cube, some core cubes should be reviewed in the same mailing
list as cubicweb (eg. signedrequest, rqlio, rememberme, etc.).

Others should probably be dispatched by "application" (e.g. forge,
logilab apps (crm, fresh and all), etc.) and the choice will be left for
clients work. This is a proposal to be discussed of course.

Sylvain Thénault, LOGILAB, Paris ( - Toulouse (
Formations Python, Debian, Méth. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:    http://www.cubicweb.org

More information about the Cubicweb mailing list