[Cubicweb] commit and rollback on rqlcontroller

Jinpeng Li mr.li.jinpeng at gmail.com
Fri Jun 13 14:56:51 CEST 2014

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat at logilab.fr
> wrote:

> Hi Jinpeng,
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:18:52PM +0200, Jinpeng Li wrote:
> > It is better to make rqlcontroller like [...]
> Each call to rqlcontroller ends with a commit, but as you know, you
> can put several RQL queries in one call.
> The current implementation of rqlcontroller does not provide the
> equivalent of a transaction that could be created, used to call
> rqlcontroller several times, then commited or rollbacked.
> Is this what your or asking for?
Hi Nicolas,

Yes. Considering the migration point, I am interesting in this
architecture.  Anyway, I have finished the migration for my script. It is
fine for me for the moment.

So far the no response from rqlcontroller/cubicweb problem really block my

This morning, I sent an benchmark email to cubicweb at lists.cubicweb.org with
Your mail to 'Cubicweb' with the subject

    Re: [Cubicweb] Feedback on rqlcontroller

Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.

The reason it is being held:

    Message body is too big: 55359 bytes with a limit of 40 KB

Cubicweb list run by arthur.lutz at logilab.fr, nicolas.chauvat at

Feel free to approve it if you agree, and feel free to give me some
suggestion to debug.

Thanks and best regards,

> --
> Nicolas Chauvat
> logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de
> connaissances
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubicweb.org/pipermail/cubicweb/attachments/20140613/395f0569/attachment-0186.html>

More information about the Cubicweb mailing list