[Cubicweb] cubicweb-bootstrap 0.1.0: can I move the tag?

Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos dimitri.papadopoulos at cea.fr
Wed Oct 2 19:06:36 CEST 2013

Oh, if there has been a formal release it's indeed a very bad idea to 
change the tag - and the tag is not misleading either.

I guess is that a specific branch has been created for these 0.1.0-2 
changes, hasn't it?

I will then create another branch for 0.1.1. What name would you expect 
for such a branch?

Le 02/10/2013 18:56, Adrien Di Mascio a écrit :
> Hi Dimitri,
> Le 02/10/2013 18:23, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos a écrit :
>> I would like to modify the tags that refer to version 0.1.0 of
>> cubicweb-bootstrap:
>>      $ hg tags
>>      tip                               36:2babf170d1a1
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.3.0    35:878c08751af8
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-debian-version-0.3.0    35:878c08751af8
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.1.0    10:922251882152
>>      cubicweb-bootsrap-debian-version-0_1_0-1    10:922251882152
>>      $
>> There have been no formal releases of cubicweb-bootstrap, neither as a
>> tarball, nor as a Debian package - at least not before version 0.3.0.
> Actually, there have been a formal release (in RPM for a client) and we
> got errors while generating the official debian package. The changesets
> fixing the debian errors have just been reviewed (rev. 7922ff973bcd and
> 6389df55f9f6) and a 0.1.0-2 debian package is on its way.
> So we're not going to move the 0.1.0 tag
>> I'm interested because we are currently using this specific changeset of
>> bootstrap in Brainomics (it's the latest marked 0.1.0, with important
>> bug fixes).
> This should go in a 0.1.1 version.
> Cheers,

Dimitri Papadopoulos
I2BM, NeuroSpin
F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France

More information about the Cubicweb mailing list