[Cubicweb] Mercurial branches for CubicWeb
Christophe de Vienne
christophe at cdevienne.info
Fri Jun 24 13:08:47 CEST 2016
Bookmarks are actually not a tool for keeping track of branches IMHO,
especially not permanent branches as former versions maintenance
branches. For those, named branches do exactly the job and I see no
drawback using them.
For short term branches (like feature branches), the new 'topics'
feature of hg does a very nice job, much better than bookmarks.
I personally see bookmarks as volatile tags (as opposed to pointers to
branch heads), and in my experience using them for anything else was
Le 24/06/2016 12:57, Florent Cayré a écrit :
> Bookmarks in hg are a bit crappy for the moment IMHO. Work is ongoing on
> the matter in hg AFAIK.
> Cubicweb mailing list
> Cubicweb at lists.cubicweb.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cubicweb