[Cubicweb] cubicweb-bootstrap 0.1.0: can I move the tag?
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos
dimitri.papadopoulos at cea.fr
Wed Oct 2 19:06:36 CEST 2013
Oh, if there has been a formal release it's indeed a very bad idea to
change the tag - and the tag is not misleading either.
I guess is that a specific branch has been created for these 0.1.0-2
changes, hasn't it?
I will then create another branch for 0.1.1. What name would you expect
for such a branch?
Le 02/10/2013 18:56, Adrien Di Mascio a écrit :
> Hi Dimitri,
> Le 02/10/2013 18:23, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos a écrit :
>> I would like to modify the tags that refer to version 0.1.0 of
>> $ hg tags
>> tip 36:2babf170d1a1
>> cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.3.0 35:878c08751af8
>> cubicweb-bootstrap-debian-version-0.3.0 35:878c08751af8
>> cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.1.0 10:922251882152
>> cubicweb-bootsrap-debian-version-0_1_0-1 10:922251882152
>> There have been no formal releases of cubicweb-bootstrap, neither as a
>> tarball, nor as a Debian package - at least not before version 0.3.0.
> Actually, there have been a formal release (in RPM for a client) and we
> got errors while generating the official debian package. The changesets
> fixing the debian errors have just been reviewed (rev. 7922ff973bcd and
> 6389df55f9f6) and a 0.1.0-2 debian package is on its way.
> So we're not going to move the 0.1.0 tag
>> I'm interested because we are currently using this specific changeset of
>> bootstrap in Brainomics (it's the latest marked 0.1.0, with important
>> bug fixes).
> This should go in a 0.1.1 version.
F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
More information about the Cubicweb