[Cubicweb] cubicweb-bootstrap 0.1.0: can I move the tag?

Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos dimitri.papadopoulos at cea.fr
Wed Oct 2 22:47:11 CEST 2013


I have created the 0.1.1 tag:
	cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.1.1

I'm not moving the 0.1.0 tags, but would it be OK to rename one of them? 
 From its current name:
	cubicweb-bootsrap-debian-version-0_1_0-1
to the seemingly more standard:
	cubicweb-bootstrap-debian-version-0.1.0-1
or even better - since it was used to build an RPM:
	cubicweb-bootstrap-centos-version-0.1.0-1


Le 02/10/2013 18:56, Adrien Di Mascio a écrit :
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> Le 02/10/2013 18:23, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos a écrit :
>> I would like to modify the tags that refer to version 0.1.0 of
>> cubicweb-bootstrap:
>>      $ hg tags
>>      tip                               36:2babf170d1a1
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.3.0    35:878c08751af8
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-debian-version-0.3.0    35:878c08751af8
>>      cubicweb-bootstrap-version-0.1.0    10:922251882152
>>      cubicweb-bootsrap-debian-version-0_1_0-1    10:922251882152
>>      $
>>
>> There have been no formal releases of cubicweb-bootstrap, neither as a
>> tarball, nor as a Debian package - at least not before version 0.3.0.
>
> Actually, there have been a formal release (in RPM for a client) and we
> got errors while generating the official debian package. The changesets
> fixing the debian errors have just been reviewed (rev. 7922ff973bcd and
> 6389df55f9f6) and a 0.1.0-2 debian package is on its way.
>
> So we're not going to move the 0.1.0 tag
>
>> I'm interested because we are currently using this specific changeset of
>> bootstrap in Brainomics (it's the latest marked 0.1.0, with important
>> bug fixes).
>
> This should go in a 0.1.1 version.
>
> Cheers,
>


-- 
Dimitri Papadopoulos
CEA/Saclay
I2BM, NeuroSpin
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
+33 (0)1 69 08 79 12



More information about the Cubicweb mailing list