[Cubicweb] annotating divs with rql and vid

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr
Thu May 24 17:25:28 CEST 2012


On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:23:17PM +0200, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> On 24 mai 17:01, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:03:58PM +0200, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> > > * A lot of views are not only depending on the rql+vid couple, but also
> > >   on additional, arbitrary, arguments. This is somewhat handled by facets
> > >   currently but is imo not really fancy. This later pb could be handled
> > >   by making views more easily self-contained, as recently done (at least
> > >   partially) for table views.
> > 
> > I wrote an extensive proposal to handle this View arguement issue:
> > 
> >     https://www.cubicweb.org/ticket/2105837
> > 
> > This is somehow implemented for a client project and it (just) works.
> > 
> > Self-contained view is a very dispointing and non-intuitive solution.
> 
> Giving argument to view is only part of the pb. Handling them dynamically
> in e.g. facets context without transmitting information all along the way
> is my concerns here.

Why is it a concern to transmit information all along the way ?

I'm curious to see your usecase requiring such optimisation.

-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cubicweb.org/pipermail/cubicweb/attachments/20120524/a42b4231/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Cubicweb mailing list