[Cubicweb] some cubicweb goals for 2010
aurelien.campeas at logilab.fr
Wed Apr 28 13:40:10 CEST 2010
Le mercredi 28 avril 2010 à 13:11 +0200, Sylvain Thénault a écrit :
> On 28 avril 12:36, Aurélien Campeas wrote:
> > > I dunno yet if I prefer an additional 'hooks' package or if it should goes
> > > in logic too. Opinion on this?
> > hmm all of this looks a bit gratuitous and I'm actually pleased with how
> > the current things are named/organised ... (for the record)
> I'm not fine with pre/post create files in migration/.
> I'm not fine with sobjects module or package.
> I'm not fine with a schema.py along with a schema directory containing
> sql extension files.
> Also, using proper vocabulary isn't gratuitous.
well, schema package contains a schema definition, hooks package
contains hooks & ops, entities package contains entities classes ...
how is that not a proper vocabulary ?
More information about the Cubicweb